This aerial photograph was taken in December 2024 and showcases Djibouti, located in East Africa. The Trump administration ...

Courts blocked the handover after lawyers raised concerns of torture. Then the Supreme Court intervened to allow the Trump ...

Eight men deported from the United States in May and held under guard for weeks at an American military base in the African ...

The Trump administration will be able to send eight migrants held in Djibouti for weeks to South Sudan, where they fear they ...

The Supreme Court cleared the way for the Trump administration to deport a group of migrants with criminal records held at a ...

Describing the district court ruling as “untenable” and a “lawless act of defiance,” the Department of Justice urged the Supreme Court to clarify that its earlier stay also covers the May 21 order ...

The Supreme Court delivered a major decision Friday that limits federal judges’ power to block the president’s agenda nationwide. Stemming from a case over Trump’s order on birthright ...

The divided court ruled that individual judges lack the authority to grant nationwide injunctions but left open the possibility that the birthright citizenship changes could remain blocked nationwide.

The Supreme Court was once viewed as an impartial institution by many Americans, but recent decisions have undermined that perception.

Here's what to know about birthright citizenship, the Supreme Court's ruling and what happens next.

The Supreme Court's restriction on nationwide injunctions is a radical limit on the power of the federal courts. Nothing in any federal law or the Constitution justifies it.